CCTV, Motion Detection and Linux

Over the summer, I found myself with quite a bit of free time on my hands. I have also, for some time, been eager to install a small CCTV camera at my front door to see who's at the door (Quick, hide behind the sofa!). This is partly for my girlfriend and partly for my gadget obsession.

I read on BBC News and also seperately on The Register about a burglar who was caught when he stole the PC which was monitoring a house's security camera. The PC emailed every image of any movement detected on the camera to a remote email address which, obviously, was quite theftproof.

I thought it was a marvellous idea, having a visual record of any event on a security camera sent to a remote email account (far from where the event is happening and also very secure) which doesn't need any authentication to send to (and therefore leaves no passwords on anything that could be stolen) and also requires authentication (which any intruder/thief could not gain from the computer stolen) to be able to delete/view the images in question. Not only that, but the ISP logs and email images would provide quite substantial legal proof in any case coming to court, in terms of verifying times, dates, tampering etc.

Properly set up, only a pre-emptive phone line cut would be any use against it. Even then, however, there's always the possibility of having a mobile phone,possibly even inside the case of the computer or as one of those PCMCIA GPRS cards, dialling up to an ISP, or even more complicated setups like wireless links between friendly neighbours or to a wireless ISP.

Short of covering from head to toe, cutting the whole neighbourhood's phone lines beforehand (an event certain to attract an unwanted amount of attention), jamming the 2.4GHz that most wireless networks run on and making sure to steal the PC's and any video recording equipment which was running the camera, and then wiping that PC with tools secure enough to obliterate any history of any images being written to the drive, there's not much a burglar could do about sending out some sort of information about themself.

I loved the idea of such a system and also that it actually works in practice, as the above story shows. Some months before this news story I had seen a piece of software that did this and apparently that was the one used to catch this particular burglar. This renewed my interest in Motion.

It didn't hurt that the software was Linux-based, free to use, easy to customise and very powerful. Any camera input (USB webcams, networked or wireless PC-compatible cameras, BT848-based TV cards or, indeed, any video equipment with a Linux BTTV driver) could be fed into the system (in fact many feeds are trivially possible), have complex motion detection algorithms run on it, with still images, short movies and even the audio being recorded whenever motion was detected.

These images and sounds could then be stored, transferred, archived or emailed anywhere (I suppose that FTP or SSH is also easy to do, basically the software writes a JPG/MPG and then runs a shell script of your choice on it whenever it detects motion). Additionally, it would be possible to watch through the cameras at any time by using suitable authentication on the web-based interface, showing real-time images to whatever computer on whichever continent you happen to be.

Over the summer, I invested in a cheap CCTV kit with remote 8" monitor. This monitor could not only supply power to and read video and audio from two different cameras, it would also output one of their composite outputs again without the need for further adaptors or cables. This seemed the perfect setup... a camera wired to the monitor so that I can see what's happening in real time, with the output being simultaneously fed straight into a motion-detecting PC setup.

The setup was a cinch, just a matter of dusting off some WinTV cards and adding one short cable to the CCTV monitor. The software compiled and installed and within about 10 minutes I had it emailing images to an email account whenever my willing volunteer waved their hand across the camera. With some fine-tuning over the next few days of settings and image masks to take care of the timed external lights interfering with the setup, the hanging baskets outside moving in the wind etc. I had the perfect test.

We went to Scotland for a week, leaving the cat at home. We arranged for someone to come feed her during the week and I thought it would be a good test. While we were away, I would dial up to a cheap ISP, log into my home machine and watch the images live. I could also browse through my email account and find all the images of movement. I saw the neighbours walk past at 9.58 a.m. I saw the postman come at 7.00 a.m. and could even see the three items of junk mail in his hands as he walked up to the door. I saw our friend come in to feed the cat as promised. I also got one or two images of a plant pot falling over in the garden.

Now intrigued by the possibilities, I'm considering extending the system. We have a car in the private car park behind the house that can be seen from our spare room. I only wish my neighbours could all have identical systems so that when a car alarm goes off we all know who's it is without leaving the house and can ring up the offender and make them go turn it off!

I plan to install another CCTV camera as a spyhole in the front door to capture full-frontal images of the person approaching the door and maybe as many more as I can find USB webcams for (I know I have at least two lying around). All this and it will cost me a little less than £20 extra per camera to cable and put in an old WinTV card. The computer appears capable of running at least two or three more cameras in terms of CPU speed (motion detection is quite expensive in terms of CPU power) and my test/development machines are old, obsolete things that people were throwing out.

I'm even looking into using a wireless setup so that, for example, the computer running the system could be wired *and* wirelessly connected to my main desktop, other cameras or a second system in a more secure location (the loft seemed an ideal place to run the show from, given that most burglars probably wouldn't bother to go up there).

I also remember having some cards that slot into a computers rear slots and the power supply connectors. They supply 9V outputs on standard connectors that plug straight into most CCTV cameras. With those, I could have a cheap, ancient PC or could even invest in a mini-ITX board, that would be using only a single mains socket and maybe a piece of CAT5. That PC would then be connected directly and supplying power to two or more cameras (some USB, some via PCI TV Card) and even microphones, connecting to a central computer which could store and email the files.

It could even text me the pictures to my mobile or indeed ring me up with an automated message, set off an alarm system, email my neighbours to get them to have a quick look, or blast out MP3's of "Wanted", "Rescue Me" or "Stop in the name of love". It could even display the culprit's face on my home TV in full, glorious technicolour with the words "GOTCHA!" displayed over it, while playing a Wah, Wah, Wah, Wahhhhh sound over the speakers!



What an idea. Marvellous what you can do with technology.

Substrate screensaver

Normally screensavers are disabled the instant I set up a new system and my recent upgrade to Slackware 10.2 was no exception. However, I was looking through the list for a screensaver to test my 3D acceleration to see if my NVidia drivers were working and came across Substrate.

This is a wonderful little screensaver that I find quite beautiful, some say it looks like the evolution of a city from above, others like cracks in a white rock, still others, like a Picasso in progress.

Substrate example images

Either way, it's impressive results from a simple mathematical algorithm. Pity that I can't get a Windows version for my girlfriend as every time the screensaver activates on my machine, she sits and watches it grow.

Edit: I got in contact with the author of a port of XScreensaver, after many, many attempts at trying to find a suitable Win32 version or a version that would compile cleanly under Cygwin or similar environment, and he happened to have a Windows binary of this screensaver just hanging about. So thanks Darren Stone for your help! The version of WinXScreenSaver on his software page didn't have it when I tried but he pointed me to a version of just that screensaver that he had compiled some time ago: http://tron.lir.dk/software/w_substrate.zip

(As of late-February 2008, the above website appears to be down. For now, there is a mirror of this file here: http://www.ledow.org.uk/windows/w_substrate.zip

Another Linux Desktop Update (and Slackware 10.2)

The Linux desktop machine is not only still going well, but getting better all the time. In fact, Windows has been deleted from my main computer, the result I'd been hoping for and something I'd been wanting to do for years. As far as I'm concerned, Windows in all it's variations is now just another console, good for games, not much use for anything else.

I recently upgraded to Slackware 10.2 on my main computer. Generally my computer is usually near the most updated you can get without having Beta or Alpha or CVS-build software on a machine. When it comes to upgrades, I upgrade to the next version of software depending on:

1) Whether I can run it in tandem with the older version - While this is possible with most things (e.g. Opera, PuTTY, TightVNC), it's not always possible with major upgrades. I want to KNOW that I can run the new version but that if there is a single regression I can still use the version I was using before.

2) Whether I can always revert to the older version if I want - This is where a package management system beats the built-in Windows features hands down. Not only will Swaret find, download, install and check dependencies of any software I install using it, it will also make a backup of the previous version. A simple removepkg/installpkg will get me right back to where I wanted, at worst having to replace any tailored config files from a personal backup. Most Linux distributions have such facilities, RPM, DEB, etc.

3) Other people's experiences of upgrading to that software - Lots of confirmed reports found on Google, relevant forums etc. of no major problems is the best thing, lack of any reports of major problems is next best. The less information available, the less I trust the upgrade.

4) Reputation of and previous experience installing that software - a program which has never had an install problem, upgrades itself neatly and compactly, is able to import all of its old settings etc. is one I'm more likely to upgrade as soon as I can.

5) The severity of the upgrade - how important an upgrade it is will determine how quickly I will be upgrading to it. Serious security updates for critical flaws and serious bug fixes for dangerous bugs will be more likely to be installed that something that corrects a spelling mistake in a filename.

6) The enormity of the upgrade - minor upgrades are more likely to occur, major upgrades may be postponed until I can test them out fully.

Given the above, a Slackware 10.1 -> Slackware 10.2 upgrade snags on 4,5 and 6. Numbers 1 and 2 are dependent on how carefully I think through the upgrade, and information for 3 wasn't available, although many people have been running the slackware-current version between the 10.1 and 10.2 release (I hereby thank all the willing testers for ensuring my machine will be relatively safe by the time 10.2 comes out).

Security wasn't a major problem - I was properly firewalled, my common desktop software (Opera etc.) was always at the latest stable version and nothing exposed to the internet was vulnerable. There were a few upgrades I was looking forward to, most notably a Ghostscript upgrade that made my printer (a Samsung ML-4500... possibly the only laser printer I've ever seen that you can open the specially-designed toner cartridge and just pour in certain toner without having to re-buy the entire cartridge) work much better under CUPS.

KDE upgrades were also on my agenda but not something I was happy attempting on my primary desktop machine by myself. This fixed things like my icons jitting about the place between (fairly infrequent) reboots, konqueror crashing while navigating the filesystem and numerous other little niggles.

It turned out in the end that I managed to clear out my old 10Gb Windows partition (so there really is no going back now!), after throwing a few lifebelts to things like documents, INI files and other stuff that might come in handy someday. With Slackware, unlike Windows, I literally formatted the drive as ext3 and copied the old Slackware install over using cp -a -x to the blank drive. This copied all the files, links, etc. over without modifying them.

A small oversight discovered later was that the -x (stay on a single filesystem) for some reason excluded /dev but even *that* couldn't stop Linux trying it's best to boot (although a lot of drivers complained). That went into the rather short list of "Should I ever have to do this again, remember to"'s.

Once the filesystem was copied across, I booted from a boot disk making sure that the new partition was the linux root. I played with the lilo config to set it up (keeping some older entries to boot back into the original config should I ever need to), edited fstab and then reinstalled lilo.

[[ Side note: My favourite thing about Linux in general is that any kernel can boot any partition on any computer. I needn't have bothered with this backwards compatibility entries in lilo, I could have just booted from any Slackware boot CD that I had laying around and tell it which partition to use as root and I can fix/run anything to get it back up and working.]]

Then I booted into this identical copy of my root and only once I was in and everything was working as if it was my old drive did I follow through the Slackware 10.1 -> 10.2 UPGRADE.TXT instructions.

The upgrade went very smoothly and once the package upgrades were complete, it was merely a matter of setting up lilo again to boot from the 10.2 2.6.13 generic kernel that had been installed (making my own initrd on the way) and then rebooting.

[[side note: Although I think that initrd are a marvellous idea (a small mid-boot ramdisk environment to bung in any strange drivers that may be needed at boot time, e.g. USB/Firewire Mass Storage, SCSI etc.) they can be a pain in the backside when you just want to add a new line to lilo with a slightly different config. That usually means rebuilding the initrd with different root parameters etc. which soon can become a file-management nightmare, having to keep kernels, configs and initrds for every different combination. Hell... it works and you can tweak it to do some complicated stuff, so I'll suffer it.]]

After that, it was simply a matter of seeing what needed recompiling to fit in with the numerous upgrades that were in 10.2 (kernel, KDE, QT, libraries etc.). I didn't even bother to check whether the proprietry NVidia drivers I use (the only low-level non-source-code thing I have installed on this machine) would need recompiling as I was certain they would. This went without a hitch and then I was able to boot into X-Windows on this new system and "see what else had broke".

That turned out to be the driver for my never-used wireless card (which is used for purely experimental purposes as I don't generally trust wireless in any way shape or form, ever since I demonstrated to myself just how easy it is to crack WEP and really interfere with most wireless networks whatever the encryption... the only access allowed over the wireless interface is a public-key authenticated SSH). That caused me some minor problems as it was complaining about the module config of the kernel (a missing file normally attributed to having kernel source lying around which didn't actually compile the kernel in question). This turned out to be a bit of a false alarm as the module would load normally anyway and worked perfectly.

Other than minor issues and a bit of user stupidity, there were no problems. Strange, for an upgrade that's the equivalent of going from Windows 95 to 98, or NT4 to 2000, that there was so little upheaval and virtually zero compatibility problems. And yet, my primary partition was never in any danger and with a small boot from the CD and a tiny LILO tweak, I'd have been back as if I'd never touched the machine.

I have now also tried Knoppix 4.0 on my laptop, similarly impressed that it needs absolutely no prior knowledge of what system it's going to run on. I'm amazed at just how much of the stuff that I have bought or been given "just works" in Linux, at worst requiring me to hunt down a small GPL driver from somewhere:

The QX3 microscope I found at a boot sale.
A cheapy PSX->PC USB controller adaptor (though games are not the focus on this machine, it was just out of interest).
A cheapy USB hard drive enclosure, again found at a boot sale.
My Intel NetportExpress (from eBay) connected so that myself and my girlfriend can stop fighting over who gets to use what printer.
My cheapy graphics tablet that was bought on a whim and never really used

Admittedly, some things I deliberately research to ensure they work on both operating systems; my wireless card, my USB key, my cheapy, ancient printer, my sound card (went through two or three old, donated and junked sound cards which, while they all worked under Linux, all showed performance problems. In the end, I just bought a cheapy SoundBlaster Live off eBay to save me having to use software mixing).

I always knew that Linux had problems with certain pieces of hardware, back from when I first heard about Linux when I was just a lad. Now I think that 99% of the problems are sorted out and most systems "just work". Heck, even most winmodems can be persuaded to work in Linux, even if they do need a binary driver. So far, the only thing I've found that remains resolutely incompatible with Linux is a small USB-IrDA adaptor that was never bought to work with Linux and, though it's detected as a serial port, doesn't actually support all the IR protocols that it would under Windows.

Addendum: And now I'm being asked to install Linux systems for an unattended kiosk-style system and a few small specialised workstations running the QX3's inside some of the schools.